Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bank could proceed under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 for sale of the secured asset despite occupation of the property and apprehended resistance, and whether the parties were required to file undertakings to facilitate sale.
Analysis: The order records that the bank is entitled under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to bring the secured property to sale for realisation of its dues and that civil court jurisdiction is barred by Section 34 of that Act. It also notes that the earlier arrangement for sale had been frustrated because vacant possession was not available, and the parties stated that they would file undertakings to ensure sale free from encumbrances and hand over possession to the successful purchaser after completion of sale.
Conclusion: The bank's entitlement to proceed with sale under the SARFAESI regime was affirmed, while the matter was kept pending for further compliance through affidavits of undertaking.