Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit under Rule 16 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 could be denied when duty-paid machines returned after the rental period were dismantled and their components were used in the manufacture of other machines.
Analysis: Rule 16 permits credit when excisable goods are brought back to a factory for being remade, refined, re-conditioned, or for any other reason. The returned machines were not remade, refined, or reconditioned, but the factual position showed that they were brought back and dismantled, and their components were used in the manufacture of other goods. The facts were held to be covered by the earlier Tribunal view relied upon by the appellate authority, and the credit could not be refused merely because the returned goods were used as components rather than restored in their original form.
Conclusion: The denial of credit was not justified and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.