Assessee wins appeal on Section 69A addition for demonetization deposits but loses on telephone expenses claim

The ITAT Raipur allowed the assessee's appeal regarding addition under section 69A for unexplained money. The AO had treated cash deposits during demonetization as unexplained money, alleging the assessee deposited unaccounted funds disguised as sales proceeds and received old currency after the specified deadline. The ITAT held that since the AO accepted the sales in the assessment order under section 143(3), the basis for treating deposits as unexplained money failed. Even assuming receipt of demonetized currency after the deadline, this alone could not justify section 69A addition. However, the ITAT dismissed the appeal regarding telephone expenses, upholding the AO's disallowance of one-fourth expenses due to lack of proper documentation substantiating business use.

---

---

Issues:
1. Addition u/s.69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for cash deposits during demonetization period
2. Disallowance of telephone expenses without proper documentation

Analysis:

Issue 1: Addition u/s.69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for cash deposits during demonetization period:

The case involved the assessee, a dealer of Essar Oil Ltd. trading petroleum products under Swastik Fuels, Bhatapara, whose cash deposits during demonetization were scrutinized. The Assessing Officer (A.O) noted cash deposits of Rs.6,80,42,748/- in the bank account, including demonetized currency after the specified period. The A.O raised concerns about the source of these deposits, especially after the allowed demonetization period. The A.O made additions u/s.69A of the Act, considering unaccounted money or sales proceeds in old currency. The CIT(Appeals) upheld the A.O's decision. However, the Judicial Member analyzed the situation and found discrepancies in the A.O's reasoning. The Judicial Member observed that the A.O failed to reject the books of accounts before recharacterizing sales as unaccounted money. Additionally, the Judicial Member found no justification for treating the deposits as unexplained money under section 69A, ultimately setting aside the addition of Rs.6.86 lacs. The Grounds of appeal No. 1 & 2 were allowed based on these observations.

Issue 2: Disallowance of telephone expenses without proper documentation:

The A.O disallowed 1/4th of the assessee's telephone and mobile expenses of Rs.62,375/- and added Rs.15,593/- due to lack of logbook or supporting evidence for business-related expenditure. The CIT(Appeals) upheld this disallowance. The Judicial Member concurred with the lower authorities, stating that without proper documentation to substantiate the expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, the disallowance was justified. Therefore, the disallowance of Rs.15,593/- was upheld. Ground of appeal No. 3 was dismissed in this regard.

In conclusion, the Judicial Member partly allowed the assessee's appeal, setting aside the addition under section 69A while upholding the disallowance of telephone expenses. The general grounds of appeal were dismissed as not pressed.

---