Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether non-realisation of export proceeds amounted to contravention of section 18(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, and whether penalty could be sustained against the partner under section 68(1) for the same alleged contravention.
Analysis: The outstanding export proceeds had been partly adjusted against surplus advance remittances with the permission of the RBI, and the balance amount had been written off by the RBI. On these facts, the failure to realise the full amount could not be treated as a contravention of section 18(2). Once the principal appellant was found not guilty of contravention, the basis for proceeding against the partner under section 68(1) for the same default also disappeared.
Conclusion: No contravention of section 18(2) was made out, and the penalty on the partner under section 68(1) was also unsustainable.