Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant contravened section 18(2) and section 18(3) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 by failing to take reasonable steps for realisation of export proceeds and by permitting auction of the shipment, warranting imposition of penalty.
Analysis: The correspondence on record showed continuous follow-up with the shipping agent and the new buyer to prevent auction of the goods. The Reserve Bank of India had permitted the requested 30% discount and extension of time for recovery of the export proceeds, which supported the appellant's bona fides. The balance amount was shown to have already been adjusted towards insurance and service charges, leaving nothing further payable by the shipping company. On these facts, the appellant had taken all reasonable steps that could have been taken to realise the sale proceeds and to avoid auction of the shipment.
Conclusion: The appellant was not guilty of contravention of section 18(2) or section 18(3) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, and the penalty was rightly quashed.