Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty for delayed non-realisation of export proceeds under sections 18(2) and 18(3) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was sustainable when the export proceeds were subsequently realised and the presumption of contravention was rebutted.
Analysis: Section 18(2) does not treat non-realisation of export proceeds, by itself, as a contravention in every case. Section 18(3) raises only a rebuttable presumption that the exporter did not take reasonable steps to receive or recover payment. On the facts, the buyer's financial difficulty, the settlement arrived at with Reserve Bank permission, the receipt of promissory notes, the grant of extension by the Reserve Bank, the pending application for further extension, and the eventual realisation of the entire amount supported the appellants' case. The adjudicating authority did not identify any specific act or omission showing lack of reasonable steps or any basis to conclude that the presumption remained unrebutted.
Conclusion: The presumption under section 18(3) stood rebutted and the penalty could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the penalty order was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty for delayed export realisation under section 18 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 cannot be sustained unless the authority shows that the exporter failed to take reasonable steps and the statutory presumption remains unrebutted.