Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty for non-realisation of export proceeds under section 18(2) read with section 18(3) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was sustainable after the Reserve Bank of India granted permission to write off the unrealised amounts.
Analysis: The appellant's default was founded on non-realisation of export proceeds within the prescribed period. The adjudicating authority imposed penalty because no favourable order had been obtained from the Reserve Bank of India for extension of time or write-off. During the appeal, permission from the Reserve Bank of India to write off the unrealised amounts was produced. Once such permission was granted, the basis of the penalty order no longer survived, since the appellant had taken the steps available to it for regularising the matter and the remaining non-realisation could not be attributed to any wilful failure on its part.
Conclusion: The appellant was not liable for contravention of section 18(2) read with section 18(3) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, and the penalty was set aside.