Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Succeeds: Rs. 6,00,000 Penalty for FERA, 1973 Set Aside Due to Insufficient Evidence; Findings Annulled.</h1> The appeal against the penalty order under FERA, 1973, resulted in the penalty of Rs. 6,00,000 being set aside. The appellant's challenge to the findings ... - The appeal was filed against the order of penalty passed under FERA, 1973. The appellant was found guilty of contravening statutory provisions and imposed with a penalty of Rs. 6,00,000. The appellant challenged the findings, and the penalty was set aside as there was no convincing material to establish guilt. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned finding and penalty were set aside.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
