TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>SC Overturns Charges u/ss 27A and 29A of NDPS Act Due to Insufficient Recovery; Other Charges Stand.</h1> <h3>Sanjeev Chandra Agarwal and Ors. Versus Union of India (UOI)</h3> The SC overturned the HC's order to frame charges under Sections 27A and 29A of the NDPS Act against the Appellants, citing insufficient recovery of ... Framing charges Under Sections 27A and 29A of the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - recovery of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances from the premises of the two Appellants - Section 67 of the N.D.P.S. Act - HELD THAT:- While not interfering with the order directing framing of charges Under Section 9A and 25, direction in the impugned order to frame charges against the two Appellants namely, Sanjeev Chandra Agarwal and Rajiv Sethi Under Sections 27A and 29A of the N.D.P.S. Act cannot be sustained and is set aside. Appeal allowed. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order directing framing charges under Sections 27A and 29A of the N.D.P.S. Act against the Appellants due to lack of recovery of narcotic drugs. Charges under Sections 9A and 25 were upheld. Bail for the Appellants remains unaffected.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
