Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deletion of the protective addition made on account of alleged difference in the arm's length price of advertisement, marketing and promotion expenses by applying the Bright Line Test was sustainable.
Analysis: The issue was covered against the Revenue by an earlier binding decision holding that the Bright Line Test could not be applied in the manner suggested. The Tribunal had followed that decision while deleting the addition, and the same view had also been taken in an appeal concerning the same assessee for another assessment year.
Conclusion: The deletion of the addition was upheld and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the issue stands concluded by binding precedent rejecting application of the Bright Line Test to the AMP adjustment in the manner sought by the Revenue, no substantial question of law arises and the Tribunal's deletion of the addition calls for no interference.