1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>HC Upholds ITAT's Decision on Rs.4.26 Crore Arms Length Price Discrepancy in International Transaction Expenses.</h1> The HC dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the ITAT's decision concerning the addition of Rs.4,26,35,832 related to the Arms Length Price discrepancy ... Addition on protective basis on account of the difference in the Arms Length Price (βALPβ) of the international transaction on advertisement, marketing and promotion (βAMPβ) expenses by applying the Bright Line Test (βBLTβ) - HELD THAT:- The said issue stands answered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by the decision of this Court in Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd. [2015 (3) TMI 580 - DELHI HIGH COURT] Therefore, the impugned order of the ITAT, which follows and applies the above decision, suffers from no legal infirmity. An identical question raised by the Revenue in relation to the order of the ITAT in the case involving the same Assessee for AY 2010-11, was rejected by this Court, by dismissing the Revenueβs appeal [2016 (8) TMI 1175 - DELHI HIGH COURT] The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the ITAT's order regarding the addition of Rs.4,26,35,832 on account of the difference in Arms Length Price of international transaction on AMP expenses. The ITAT's decision was in line with a previous court ruling, and no substantial question of law arose.