Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order passed under Section 148A(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, without effectively granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the show cause notice, was liable to be set aside and the petitioner given time to file a reply.
Analysis: The petitioner had sought additional time to answer the show cause notice, and the authority passed the impugned order without dealing with that request. In the circumstances, the Court found it appropriate to afford an opportunity to respond before further action under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was taken.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the petitioner was granted 15 days to file a reply to the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The authorities were directed to consider the reply and pass appropriate orders thereafter.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the extent of securing a fresh opportunity to respond before reassessment proceedings could proceed further.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a assessee has sought reasonable time to respond to a show cause notice in reassessment proceedings, procedural fairness may require that an effective opportunity be granted before an adverse order is made.