TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Allows Appeal After 1110-Day Delay, Citing Equitable Treatment for Illiterate Villagers' Compensation.</h1> <h3>Imrat Lal Versus Land Acquisition Collector</h3> The SC overturned the dismissal of an appeal due to a 1110-day delay in filing under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act. The delay was attributed to ... - Issues:1. Condonation of delay in filing appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act.2. Judicial approach in cases involving compensation determination in land acquisition matters.Analysis:1. The judgment involves a case where the Appellants sought condonation of a 1110-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act. The delay was due to the Appellants entrusting their appeals to other claimants who failed to file the appeal on their behalf. The learned Single Judge dismissed the condonation application, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred. The Supreme Court considered the vague explanation provided by the Appellants but noted that another Single Judge had granted relief in similar matters. The Court emphasized the need for a liberal approach in such cases, especially considering the illiteracy and lack of legal knowledge among villagers. Citing a previous case, the Court directed that those who did not seek intervention due to various constraints should be granted enhanced compensation.2. The judgment highlighted the importance of adopting a liberal approach in land acquisition matters concerning compensation determination. The Court acknowledged the challenges faced by villagers, who are often illiterate and rely on others for legal proceedings. It stressed the need for courts to consider the circumstances of affected parties, especially in cases where relief has been granted to similarly situated individuals. By referencing a previous case where enhanced compensation was ordered for disadvantaged landowners, the Court underscored the obligation to ensure fair treatment and access to justice for all parties involved in land acquisition disputes.This detailed analysis of the judgment provides insights into the legal principles applied by the Supreme Court in addressing issues related to delay condonation and the judicial approach in land acquisition cases, emphasizing fairness, equitable treatment, and consideration of the circumstances of affected parties.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
