Section 7 application admitted for Rs. 886 crores default, moratorium imposed on debtor's assets

The NCLT Mumbai admitted a section 7 application filed by a financial creditor against a corporate debtor for default of Rs. 886 crores. The tribunal established that the creditor had sanctioned and disbursed loan facilities, the debt qualified as financial debt under section 5(8) of the Code, and the debtor had defaulted under section 3(12). Finding all statutory formalities completed and no response from the debtor, the tribunal admitted the petition. Moratorium provisions under section 14 became operative, prohibiting institution of suits and transfer/encumbrance of debtor's assets.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Admission of Petition/Application by Financial Creditor against Debtor for default in loan repayment under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Detailed Analysis:

Admission of Petition/Application:
The Financial Creditor, IDBI Bank Limited, filed a Petition/Application against the Debtor, M/S. EPC Constructions India Private Limited, for defaulting on a loan amount of 886 Crores. The Financial Creditor invoked Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, submitting that the Debtor had availed various loan facilities and defaulted in repayment. The Financial Creditor provided evidence of disbursing loans, issuing demand letters, and recording defaults with relevant authorities. The Debtor accepted the default due to financial difficulties but did not oppose the Petition/Application's admission, agreeing to cooperate in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).

Findings and Order:
The Member (J) analyzed the submissions and records, confirming that the Financial Creditor had sanctioned and disbursed loans to the Debtor, leading to a total outstanding amount of 969,17,72,492/-. The nature of the debt qualified as "Financial Debt" under the Code, and a default was established under Section 3 (12) of the Code. Despite granting time to the Debtor to file a reply, no response was received, and the default was admitted. The Member (J) found the Petition/Application complete as per Section 7 of the Code, leading to the admission of the Petition/Application.

Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional:
Following the admission, an Insolvency Professional, Mr. Abhijit Guhathakurtha, was proposed and appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to oversee the Insolvency Resolution Process. The Moratorium under Section 14 of the Code was imposed, prohibiting legal actions against the Debtor and asset transfers. Essential supplies to the Debtor were to continue, and a Public Announcement of the CIRP initiation was mandated. The IRP was tasked with reporting progress and compliance within 30 days, adhering to all Code provisions.

Conclusion:
The Petition/Application was admitted, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process effective immediately. The IRP's responsibilities, compliance requirements, and progress reporting were outlined, ensuring adherence to the Code's procedures for the resolution of the financial dispute between the Financial Creditor and the Debtor.

---