Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for computation of capital gains under section 50C(1), the stamp valuation is to be taken as on the date of the agreement to sell where the agreement and registration dates differ and part consideration was received before the agreement date, and whether the proviso inserted by the Finance Act, 2016 is applicable retrospectively.
Analysis: The dates of agreement to sell and registration were different, but both fell within the same financial year. Part of the consideration had been received before the date of the agreement by account payee cheque, satisfying the statutory condition in the proviso to section 50C(1). The amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2016 was treated as curative and clarificatory, following the coordinate Bench view that the stamp duty value on the date of agreement could be adopted where the statutory conditions were met.
Conclusion: The stamp valuation as on the date of agreement to sell was applicable, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The addition made by adopting the stamp duty value on the date of sale deed was not sustainable, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: The proviso to section 50C(1) permitting adoption of stamp valuation on the date of agreement applies where the agreement date and registration date differ and consideration is received through prescribed banking channels before the agreement; the amendment is curative and retrospective.