GST Search Validated: Authorities Prove Legitimate Proceedings Through Proper INS-01 Authorization and Compelling Evidence

HC dismissed writ petition challenging GST search and seizure proceedings. CGST authorities successfully presented INS-01 authorization, disproving petitioner's claims of invalid initiation. Court corrected previous order's reference from INS-04 to INS-01 and rejected the petition based on submitted evidence.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to search and seizure proceeding based on lack of INS-01 authorization.

Analysis:
The High Court of Calcutta heard a writ petition where the petitioners contested search and seizure proceedings by GST authorities, claiming the initiation was invalid due to the absence of INS-01 authorization. The counsel for the CGST authorities, Mr. Maiti, presented the INS-01 document as directed by the court, revealing that the petitioner's case was unsustainable and false, founded on baseless and incorrect allegations. The court noted an error in the previous order where INS-01 was mistakenly recorded as INS-04 in two instances, directing the correction of the same. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition (WPA 11167 of 2023) after considering the presented evidence and arguments.

This judgment primarily revolves around the validity of search and seizure proceedings initiated by GST authorities, focusing on the requirement of INS-01 authorization. The court's decision was influenced by the submission of the INS-01 document by the CGST authorities' counsel, which disproved the petitioner's claims of invalid initiation. The court emphasized the importance of accurate documentation, as highlighted by the correction of the INS-01 reference from INS-04 in the previous order. Ultimately, the court's ruling was based on the evidence presented, highlighting the significance of proper authorization and documentation in legal proceedings involving search and seizure actions.

---