Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cost of secondary packing of glass sheets was includible in the assessable value for excise duty, and whether the impugned approval of price lists subject to inclusion of packing charges was liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The governing test, as applied from the Supreme Court authorities, was whether the packing in question was necessary for putting the goods in the condition in which they were ordinarily sold in wholesale trade at the factory gate, and if so, whether the packing was of a durable nature and returnable by the buyer. On the facts, the Court found that the petitioner had not established that the secondary packing was unnecessary for wholesale sale of fragile glass sheets, nor that the crates and similar packing were in fact durable and returnable in the relevant sense. Mere assertions and isolated invoice endorsements were insufficient to show a consistent practice of return and reuse.
Conclusion: The cost of the secondary packing was rightly included in the assessable value, and the orders approving the price lists subject to such inclusion suffered from no legal infirmity.
Ratio Decidendi: Secondary packing is includible in the assessable value if it is necessary for sale in the wholesale market at the factory gate, unless the assessee proves that the packing is durable and returnable by the buyer.