Pre-deposit waiver in tax appeals: substantial arguable case and financial hardship justified full relief to the assessee.

The appellate pre-deposit requirement in customs and central excise matters may be waived wholly or partly where insistence on payment would cause undue hardship. On the facts, the presence of divergent views on classification indicated a substantial arguable case, and the assessee's financial strain was not effectively rebutted. Requiring the assessee to borrow funds to meet the deposit condition would itself create hardship, and later success in appeal would not remedy the burden suffered during the proceedings. The pre-deposit condition was therefore held to deserve full waiver, and the impugned order was modified in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the condition of pre-deposit of 50% of the adjudicated dues, imposed for hearing the appeal, ought to have been fully waived on the ground of undue hardship and financial inability.

Analysis: The petition involved a challenge to the order directing partial pre-deposit in a customs and central excise appeal. The relevant legal framework empowered the appellate authority to waive pre-deposit wholly or partially where insistence on deposit would cause undue hardship. The record showed divergent views on classification, indicating a substantial arguable case, and the plea of acute financial strain was not effectively met. Compelling the petitioner to borrow funds to satisfy the deposit condition would itself occasion hardship, while any eventual success in appeal would not compensate for the burden during the pendency of the proceedings.

Conclusion: The condition of pre-deposit ought to have been fully waived, and the impugned order was modified accordingly in favour of the assessee.

---