Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was payable on a delayed refund when the refund ultimately followed an appellate order, and whether the matter required remand only for quantification of interest.
Analysis: The explanation to Section 11BB deems an order of refund passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), the Appellate Tribunal or a Court, against an order under Section 11B(2), to be an order passed under Section 11B(2) for the purposes of interest. Since the refund was admittedly due and was paid after more than three months, the statutory conditions for interest were satisfied. The objection that no independent order had been made by the Assistant Commissioner under Section 11B(2) was rejected as being inconsistent with the explanation.
Conclusion: Interest on the delayed refund was held payable, and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal only to determine the quantum of interest.