Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled, in writ jurisdiction, to interest on the delayed payment of interest on excise refund when the underlying refund had been sanctioned long earlier but the interest component was itself paid belatedly.
Analysis: The refund claims had been pursued for years and the assessee had succeeded on classification and refund. The authorities wrongly denied or delayed the refund and then further delayed payment of interest on that refund. The statutory provision for delayed refund interest did not expressly provide for interest on interest, but the Court held that the department could not avoid liability in the peculiar facts where the amount of interest was unlawfully withheld for a substantial period. The earlier departmental and tribunal view relied upon by the revenue was treated as inapposite, while the binding clarification and later legal position supported interest from the date the refund became due. Since the claim fell outside the strict statutory rate framework, the Court granted reasonable compensation by way of interest.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to interest on the delayed payment of interest, and the claim was allowed by directing simple interest at 9% per annum on the delayed interest amount for the relevant period.
Ratio Decidendi: Where refund interest payable under the excise law is itself wrongfully withheld for an inordinate period, the Court may award reasonable interest on such delayed interest in writ jurisdiction, even though the statute does not expressly provide for interest on interest.