Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Assistant Collector's classification order under Item 18(III)(ii) of the Schedule annexed to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was liable to be set aside for breach of natural justice because no effective hearing was afforded to the manufacturers.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the classification of cellulosic spun yarn under Item 18(III)(i) or Item 18(III)(ii) of the Schedule. The record showed that the petitioners were not heard before the Assistant Collector passed the order treating the goods as falling under Item 18(III)(ii). The authority deciding such classification acted in a quasi-judicial capacity and was required to afford a reasonable opportunity of hearing before making a determination affecting duty liability. In the absence of such opportunity, the order could not be sustained. The earlier view taken in the connected Jaipur proceedings was also accepted as correctly stating the legal position.
Conclusion: The classification order was rightly quashed and the matter was required to be decided afresh after giving the petitioners an adequate opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: A quasi-judicial excise authority must afford a reasonable opportunity of hearing before determining the tariff classification of goods where the decision affects duty liability; failure to do so violates natural justice and vitiates the order.