Tribunal allows partial appeal, sets aside working capital adjustment for fresh consideration, accepts ECB interest benchmarking at LIBOR+275 basis points ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal partially. The tribunal set aside the working capital adjustment issue to the Assessing Officer/TPO for fresh ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal allows partial appeal, sets aside working capital adjustment for fresh consideration, accepts ECB interest benchmarking at LIBOR+275 basis points
ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal partially. The tribunal set aside the working capital adjustment issue to the Assessing Officer/TPO for fresh consideration, following precedents from Parexel International cases. Regarding ECB interest benchmarking, the tribunal accepted the assessee's payment of interest at LIBOR+275 basis points on a five-year ECB loan, noting that such loans can have a spread of 300 basis points and that previous orders had accepted this rate structure.
Issues Involved: 1. Working Capital Adjustment 2. Benchmarking of Interest on External Commercial Borrowing (ECB)
Summary:
Issue 1: Working Capital Adjustment
The Revenue authorities denied the working capital adjustment on the grounds that the assessee did not demonstrate the impact of working capital differences on profits, and segmental working capital was not disclosed in the annual reports of comparable companies. The AR argued that the issue had been considered by Co-ordinate Benches of the Tribunal under identical circumstances and was granted. The AR pointed out that the assessee had furnished all relevant information and computations to the TPO, which were overlooked by the Revenue authorities. The DR relied on the DRP's observations that the accounts payables and receivables shown in the balance sheet only reflect the year-end position and do not capture the impact on costs, price, or profits. The Tribunal, following the decisions in Parexel International Clinical Research (P.) Ltd. and Parexel International (India) Private Limited, set aside the issue to the file of the AO/TPO to decide afresh after considering the information furnished by the assessee.
Issue 2: Benchmarking of Interest on External Commercial Borrowing (ECB)
The Revenue authorities recorded that the taxpayer paid interest on ECB loan at 11.75%, which was considered excessive as it worked out to LIBOR+275 points. The TPO and DRP concluded that the interest rate should be LIBOR+200 points based on previous Tribunal decisions and RBI guidelines. The AR contended that the loan term was five years, not four, and thus a spread of 300 basis points was permissible. The Tribunal found that the term of the loan was indeed five years and noted that the interest rate at LIBOR+2.75% was accepted for previous assessment years. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the payment of interest on ECB by the assessee at LIBOR+275 basis points.
Conclusion:
The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the working capital adjustment issue remanded for fresh consideration and the interest on ECB issue resolved in favor of the assessee.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.