Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the accused was entitled to a copy of the post trap memo or arrest memo at the stage of investigation and whether refusal to supply it was consistent with the right to fair trial and disclosure.
Analysis: The application was founded on the principle that criminal process must disclose to the accused the material forming the basis of arrest and prosecution, especially where such material may bear on the legality of the arrest and the defence. The Court relied on the disclosure framework under Sections 173, 207, 208, 91 and 391 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, together with the guarantee of a fair trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It noted that the accused should ordinarily be supplied with material necessary to understand the basis of accusation and to avoid prejudice in defence, and that withholding the post trap memo was not justified on the facts.
Conclusion: The accused was entitled to a copy of the post trap memo or arrest memo, and the refusal to furnish it was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The application succeeded and the investigating agency was directed to supply the requested document within the time fixed by the Court.
Ratio Decidendi: Where material in the possession of the prosecution or investigating agency forms the basis of arrest or is necessary for a meaningful defence, fair trial under Article 21 requires disclosure of that material to the accused unless a legally sustainable reason for withholding it exists.