Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the receipts from sale of plants and equipment were taxable in India, having regard to the situs of the sale event and transfer of title; (ii) Whether section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied to the receipts from offshore supply of equipment.
Issue (i): Whether the receipts from sale of plants and equipment were taxable in India, having regard to the situs of the sale event and transfer of title.
Analysis: The assessee entered into independent agreements with the Indian buyer, and the supply agreement for catalyst and proprietary equipment stipulated FOB/FCA delivery at the Japanese seaport, airport or warehouse. The purchase order, bill of lading and invoices showed delivery in Japan, freight payable at destination, and payment terms linked to delivery outside India. On these facts, the sale event and transfer of title were completed outside India, and the receipts could not be regarded as accruing or arising in India.
Conclusion: The issue is decided in favour of the assessee; the receipts from offshore supply of plants and equipment are not taxable in India.
Issue (ii): Whether section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied to the receipts from offshore supply of equipment.
Analysis: Section 44BB applies only where a non-resident provides services or facilities in connection with prospecting for, or extraction or production of, mineral oils, or supplies plant and machinery on hire for such purposes. The assessee had sold the equipment on an outright basis for setting up a plant and had neither provided qualifying oilfield services nor supplied plant and machinery on hire. The preconditions of the provision were therefore absent.
Conclusion: The issue is decided in favour of the assessee; section 44BB did not apply.
Final Conclusion: The offshore supply receipts were held to be outside Indian taxability and the presumptive provision invoked by the Revenue was found inapplicable, so the assessee succeeded in the substantive appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where title and delivery of goods under a supply contract pass outside India on FOB terms, the resulting receipts are not taxable in India, and section 44BB cannot be invoked unless its statutory conditions are specifically satisfied.