Educational trust wins exemption challenge after revenue authorities wrongly denied Section 10(23C)(vi) benefits for surplus generation

The Rajasthan HC allowed a petition challenging denial of exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) for an educational trust. The revenue authorities had rejected the exemption solely based on year-to-year surplus generation. The HC relied on the Supreme Court's Queen's Educational Society judgment and CBDT Circular 14/2015, which clarified that mere surplus generation cannot be grounds for rejection if the entity operates solely for educational purposes. The court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter to respondents for fresh consideration of the exemption application in light of the established legal precedent and clarificatory circular.

---

---

Issues:
The issues involved in the judgment are the rejection of the petitioner's application for exemption under Section 10 (23C) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Jodhpur, and the contention of the petitioner that it is engaged solely in educational purposes.

Issue 1: Rejection of Application for Exemption

The petitioner, a Charitable Trust registered under various authorities, filed an application seeking exemption under Section 10 (23C) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite responding to queries and providing information, the application was rejected by the respondents through an order dated 26.11.2013. The respondent-Chief Commissioner concluded that the petitioner was generating surplus income not incidental to educational purposes, thus not qualifying for the exemption.

Issue 2: Contention of the Petitioner

The petitioner argued that it is exclusively engaged in educational activities, falling under Section 10 (23C) (vi) of the Act. It was emphasized that the surplus generated is a natural outcome of running an educational institution for charitable purposes. Citing relevant case laws, the petitioner contended that the rejection of the application was arbitrary and illegal.

Judgment

After considering the submissions and perusing the record, the Court observed that the petitioner had duly filed the application seeking exemption. The rejection was based on the belief that the petitioner was running for profit, which was disputed by the petitioner. The Court noted that the judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court, relied upon by the respondents, was overruled by the Supreme Court. Additionally, a circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax clarified that mere generation of surplus cannot be a basis for rejection of the application under Section 10 (23C) (vi).

Conclusion

In light of the observations and the legal precedents, the Court partly allowed the petition. The impugned order was quashed and set aside, with a direction for the respondents to re-consider and decide the application in accordance with the law and the clarifications provided. The respondents were instructed to complete this re-evaluation within three months from the date of the judgment.

---