Sale-linked property transaction not financial debt; section 7 insolvency filing by allottee must meet the statutory threshold.

A transaction structured as a sale of immovable property, with consideration linked to square metre pricing and adjustments for shortfall or excess realization, was treated as sale consideration rather than disbursal against the time value of money, so it did not amount to financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Even assuming allottee status in a real estate project, a section 7 application had to satisfy the amended filing threshold applicable to allottees, and compliance was not shown. On that basis, the section 7 application was held not maintainable and the rejection was upheld.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the appellant could maintain the section 7 application as an allottee of a real estate project notwithstanding the statutory threshold for such applications. (ii) Whether the transaction between the parties constituted a financial debt within the meaning of section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Issue (i): Whether the appellant could maintain the section 7 application as an allottee of a real estate project notwithstanding the statutory threshold for such applications.

Analysis: The agreement was examined as a sale and purchase arrangement, but even assuming the appellant to be an allottee within the meaning of section 2(d) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, a section 7 application by an allottee is required to satisfy the amended filing threshold under section 7(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The application was not shown to have been filed in compliance with that requirement.

Conclusion: The appellant could not maintain the section 7 application on the basis of allottee status, and the objection to maintainability failed.

Issue (ii): Whether the transaction between the parties constituted a financial debt within the meaning of section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Analysis: The arrangement was found to be a land sale transaction with consideration fixed per square metre, with the appellant entitled to commission on excess realizations and liable for adjustment where the realized amount fell short. The payments were therefore not disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money, which is essential to financial debt under section 5(8)(f).

Conclusion: The transaction did not constitute a financial debt.

Final Conclusion: The rejection of the section 7 application was upheld and the appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: A transaction structured as a sale and purchase of immovable property, where the payments are referable to sale consideration and not disbursal against the time value of money, does not amount to financial debt; an allottee-based section 7 application must also satisfy the statutory threshold prescribed for real estate allottees.

---