2024 (2) TMI 545 - HC - Income Tax

Company's criminal proceedings cannot continue after Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under IBC creates clean slate

The Madras HC held that criminal proceedings against a company cannot continue after it undergoes Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under IBC. Once ... Continuation of criminal proceedings as against company no longer in existence/ dissolved/ amalgamated - Protection u/s 32 of IBC - Legal effect of amalgamation of two companies - corporate existence of the transferor company - criminal liability of a company being merged/dissolved - HELD THAT:- The moment the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process is initiated against the corporate debtor and the application is accepted by the NCLT, the moratorium comes into operation. Once the resolution plan is accepted by the NCLT and orders are passed and the Corporate debtor gets into hands of the new management, all the past liabilities including the criminal liability of the Corporate debtor gets wiped off and the new Management takes over the company with clean slate. In the instant case, the A1 company has now gone into the hands of the new management, pursuant to the order passed by the NCLT. In view of the same, the new management takes over the A1 company as a clean slate and the criminal liability can no longer be mulcted as against A1 company. Therefore, the continuation of criminal proceedings as against A1 company can no longer subsist. Company has been taken over by a new management and the criminal liability cannot be passed on to the new management. The criminal liability of a company cannot be transferred to another company or the new management ipso facto. Therefore, the new management apart from not taking over the criminal liability of the A1 company, cannot also be made to undergo criminal prosecution for the offence committed by the persons who were incharge of the company during the relevant point of time. This Court has already recorded the fact that A2 has already died and therefore, the charge abates insofar as A2 is concerned. Accordingly, the proceedings as against A1 company in all these complaints stands quashed. It is left open to the respondent to identify the persons who were in-charge of running the company and were involved in the day today affairs of the company during the relevant point of time and it will be left open to the respondent to continue the criminal prosecution as against those officers. Issues involved:The judgment addresses the issue of criminal liability of a company under the Income Tax Act during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the impact on prosecution against the company and its new management.Details of the Judgment:Issue 1: Criminal Prosecution against A1 Company and Managing DirectorThe Income Tax Department prosecuted the company and its Managing Director for undisclosed income during assessment years 2010-2011 to 2015-2016. The company was admitted into CIRP, and the resolution plan was approved by the NCLT. The new management filed quash petitions stating that under Section 32A of IBC, the liability of the A1 company is extinguished after the resolution plan approval.Issue 2: Application of Section 32A of IBCThe Apex Court clarified that under Section 32A, the criminal liability of the corporate debtor is wiped off when new management takes over. However, individuals responsible for the company's conduct remain liable for offenses committed before CIRP. The Calcutta High Court emphasized that offenses committed during or before CIRP fall under Section 32A and require a change in management for liability extinguishment.Judgment and ConclusionThe court ruled that once the new management took over the company, the criminal liability of the A1 company was extinguished. The new management cannot be held liable for past offenses. The criminal proceedings against the company were quashed, but the respondent can pursue prosecution against individuals responsible for the company's affairs during the relevant period. The judgment aligns with previous legal interpretations and safeguards the new management from inheriting the company's criminal liability.