Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether drilling, trimming and chamfering of brake lining blanks constitutes "manufacture" within the meaning of Section 2(f) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.
Analysis: The Court examined whether the processes effected a change in the blanks that made them usable for their intended purpose only after processing. The decision adopts the character-or-use/transformation approach: where a process effects a change that confers a new utility, character or use on the product such that it can be utilised by the ultimate manufacturer, the process is not a mere simple operation but is incidental or ancillary to completion of a manufactured product. The High Court and Single Judge findings that the blanks could not be used in motor vehicles without drilling, trimming and chamfering and that only after such processes they became usable were applied and endorsed.
Conclusion: Drilling, trimming and chamfering of brake lining blanks amount to manufacture within the meaning of Section 2(f); the appeals challenging that conclusion are dismissed, adverse to the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: A process that effects a transformation giving the product a distinct character or use which it did not previously possess, thereby rendering it usable for its intended purpose, amounts to "manufacture" under Section 2(f) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.