Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount pre-deposited by the declarant was required to be deducted while computing the amount payable under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and whether the statement issued under the scheme had correctly quantified the tax dues.
Analysis: The declarant's tax liability had attained the stage of "amount in arrears" after the appellate order became final. Under the scheme, relief under Section 124(1)(c) had to be computed on the tax dues determined in the order-in-original as affirmed in appeal, and Section 124(2) mandated deduction of any pre-deposit or deposit already made during appellate proceedings or investigation. On that basis, the pre-deposited amount had to be set off against the payable amount, and the computation made in the impugned statement was found to be incorrect. The Court also corrected the petitioner's own computation and determined the revised amount payable after applying the statutory relief and deduction of pre-deposit.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit was required to be adjusted under the scheme, and the amount payable had to be recomputed. The petitioner was granted partial relief, with direction to pay the revised quantified amount for settlement under the scheme.