Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (8) TMI 542 - HC - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax dues under Sabka Vishwas must be computed first, with pre-deposits deducted only when issuing the payable statement. Under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, relief is to be computed on the statutory tax dues first, and any pre-deposit or deposit ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tax dues under Sabka Vishwas must be computed first, with pre-deposits deducted only when issuing the payable statement.

                          Under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, relief is to be computed on the statutory tax dues first, and any pre-deposit or deposit made during enquiry, investigation, audit or appellate proceedings is to be deducted only when issuing the payable statement. The Scheme's text controls the computation, and a circular cannot redefine tax dues or require prior adjustment of deposited amounts before grant of relief. The Court held that the impugned circular was inconsistent with Sections 123 and 124(2) to the extent it treated the net outstanding balance as the base for relief, and it was ineffective to that extent.




                          Issues: (i) Whether, under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, the amount paid as pre-deposit or deposit during enquiry, investigation or audit is to be deducted only after computing relief on the tax dues, or is first to be adjusted while determining tax dues. (ii) Whether Clause 2(iv) of Circular No. 1072/05/2019/CX dated 25.09.2019 could alter the statutory meaning of "tax dues" under the Scheme by requiring adjustment of pre-deposit or deposit before grant of relief.

                          Analysis: The Scheme defines "amount in arrears" as the amount of duty recoverable as arrears and provides relief under Section 124(1)(c)(ii) on the tax dues where the amount of duty exceeds the prescribed limit. Section 124(2) separately provides that any pre-deposit or deposit made during appellate proceedings, enquiry, investigation or audit shall be deducted while issuing the statement indicating the amount payable. The statutory sequence therefore requires computation of relief on the tax dues first, followed by deduction of the pre-deposit or deposit at the stage of issuing the statement. Treating the already paid amount as reducing the tax dues would substitute "outstanding" for "recoverable" and would place a payer in a worse position than a non-payer, which is inconsistent with the Scheme's object. A circular cannot enlarge or alter the Scheme, and to the extent the impugned circular required relief to be computed on the outstanding balance after prior adjustment of deposit, it went beyond the statute.

                          Conclusion: The amount of pre-deposit or deposit was required to be deducted after granting relief under the Scheme, and not before computing the relief. Clause 2(iv) of the circular could not override the statutory scheme and was ineffective to the extent of the inconsistency.

                          Issue (ii): Whether Clause 2(iv) of Circular No. 1072/05/2019/CX dated 25.09.2019 could alter the statutory meaning of "tax dues" under the Scheme by requiring adjustment of pre-deposit or deposit before grant of relief.

                          Analysis: The definition of "tax dues" in the Scheme was held to be controlled by the statute itself. The circular's treatment of "tax dues" as the net outstanding amount after prior deduction of deposit was found to be contrary to the plain text of the Scheme, especially Section 123 and Section 124(2). The Court relied on the principle that a clarificatory circular can explain but cannot change the legal effect of the parent enactment, and that a beneficial scheme must be construed literally where the language is clear. The impugned instruction, by effectively redefining the base for relief, altered the statutory computation and was therefore impermissible.

                          Conclusion: Clause 2(iv) of the circular could not validly change the statutory definition or computation of tax dues under the Scheme and was not enforceable to the extent it did so.

                          Final Conclusion: The declarations were to be recomputed by granting Scheme relief on the full tax dues first and then deducting the pre-deposit or deposit, with revised statements to be issued accordingly.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, relief is to be calculated on the statutory tax dues first, and any pre-deposit or deposit made during enquiry, investigation, audit or appeal is to be deducted only at the stage of issuing the payable statement; a circular cannot alter that statutory computation.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found