Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether quick lime and hydrated lime, being products obtained by calcination, fell outside Chapter 25 of the Central Excise Tariff and were not exigible to excise duty.
Analysis: Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 25 covered only products that had been washed, crushed, ground, powdered, sifted or subjected to similar mechanical or physical processes, but expressly excluded products that had been roasted or calcined. The goods in question were obtained by calcination and therefore did not fit within the scope of the chapter entries. In matters involving technical processes, the Tribunal's findings were not to be lightly disturbed, and no reason was shown to interfere with its conclusion.
Conclusion: The goods were not exigible to excise duty under Chapter 25, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff chapter note expressly excludes products obtained by calcination, goods manufactured through that process fall outside the relevant chapter entry and are not liable to excise duty.