TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported quicklime was classifiable under tariff item 2522 10 00 or under tariff item 2825 90 90, and whether the consequential demand of duty, interest, confiscation and penalties could be sustained.
Analysis: The classification turned on the scope of Chapter 25 and Chapter 28 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with the General Rules for the Interpretation of the First Schedule. Heading 2522 specifically covers quicklime, slaked lime and hydraulic lime, while heading 2825 covers calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide only in the pure state. The HSN Explanatory Notes showed that quicklime is an impure calcium oxide and that heading 2825 applies only where calcium oxide is in a high-purity form, approximately 98% or more. The chemical test reports showed calcium oxide content below that level. The imported goods were therefore not shown to be purified calcium oxide falling in heading 2825, and the exclusion in heading 2522 did not apply to the goods as imported. The Tribunal also held that the goods were not a composite or mixed product attracting Rule 3 of the General Rules for the Interpretation, and that the exemption notification covering quicklime under heading 2522 remained available.
Conclusion: The imported goods were correctly classifiable under tariff item 2522 10 00 and not under tariff item 2825 90 90. The duty demand, interest, confiscation consequences and penalties were not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the assessee was upheld and the impugned orders were set aside to the extent they proceeded on classification under heading 2825 and the resulting fiscal consequences.
Ratio Decidendi: Quicklime remains classifiable under heading 2522 unless the product is shown to be purified calcium oxide of the degree contemplated by heading 2825, and classification must follow the specific tariff entry and the HSN Explanatory Notes applied with the General Rules for the Interpretation.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
