Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the provisional determination of annual capacity under the Hot Re-rolling Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 could be sustained without notice to the assessee, and whether the assessee could insist on payment of duty on the basis of its declared d factor pending final determination.
Analysis: The annual capacity of a hot re-rolling mill is determined by the statutory formula under Rule 3(3), and the d factor is a material component affecting the duty liability. Rule 3(4) empowers the Commissioner to make a provisional determination pending verification of the declaration, but final determination must follow after verification and after considering the relevant facts. Since the provisional determination in the present case was made on the basis of an inspection report without notice to the assessee, the assessee was entitled to be heard before the final decision. At the same time, the provisional determination continues to operate until the final order is passed, and there was no basis to permit the assessee to substitute its own d factor for the one provisionally determined.
Conclusion: The assessee succeeded to the extent that the matter had to be redetermined by the Commissioner after notice and consideration of objections, but failed on the request to pay duty on the basis of the assessee's declared d factor pending final determination.