Tribunal Upholds NFAC Decision: No DDT Refund for Non-Resident Shareholders, Treaty Protection Not Applicable. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the decision of the NFAC to deny a refund of the Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal Upholds NFAC Decision: No DDT Refund for Non-Resident Shareholders, Treaty Protection Not Applicable.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the decision of the NFAC to deny a refund of the Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT). The Tribunal relied on a Special Bench decision, which clarified that the additional income tax on dividends to non-resident shareholders should be at the rate specified in section 115-O of the Income Tax Act, not the rate in the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The Tribunal concluded that treaty protection under DTAA is only applicable if explicitly intended by the Contracting States, thus supporting the NFAC's stance.
Issues: The main issue in this case is whether the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) was justified in not granting a refund of the Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) to the assessee.
Details of the Judgment: The assessee, engaged in the business of sales and distribution of electronic goods, imported goods for resale through its distributors in India. The return of income for the assessment year 2019-20 was filed by the assessee, declaring total income. During the year, the assessee distributed dividends to its shareholders and paid DDT on the distribution of dividends. The assessee sought a refund of the excess DDT paid.
The Tribunal referred to a recent Special Bench decision of the Mumbai Tribunal in the case of DCIT Vs. Total Oil India Private Limited. The Special Bench decision clarified that the additional income tax payable by a domestic company on dividends to non-resident shareholders shall be at the rate mentioned in section 115-O of the Income Tax Act, and not at the rate specified in the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) with the non-resident shareholders. The decision emphasized that treaty protection under DTAA can only be claimed by a domestic company paying DDT if the Contracting States intend to extend such protection.
Based on the Special Bench decision, the Tribunal dismissed the grounds raised by the assessee and upheld the decision of the NFAC to not grant a refund of the DDT. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed.
The judgment was pronounced in the open court on the specified date.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
