Revenue's penalty under Section 114A cannot exceed payable duty amount, appeal dismissed for violating statutory limits

The CESTAT Allahabad dismissed the revenue's appeal regarding penalty imposition under Section 114A of Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal held that penalty liability cannot exceed the amount of payable duty, citing SC precedent in UK Enterprises case. The revenue's penalty imposition violated express statutory provisions by exceeding the prescribed limit. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed for being contrary to established legal principles.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Imposition of penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act, 1962.
2. Interpretation of the term "or" in Section 114A.

Summary:

Issue 1: Imposition of penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the penalty imposed under Section 114A, which was equivalent to the duty confirmed without including the interest portion. The Commissioner of Customs, Noida, in the Order-in-Original, confirmed various demands and imposed penalties accordingly. The Revenue's appeal relied on Board Circular No.61/2002-CUS dated 20th September 2002, which clarified that the penalty under Section 114A should be equal to the duty and interest thereon.

Issue 2: Interpretation of the term "or" in Section 114A.

The Tribunal considered the submissions and referred to the Board Circular and various judicial precedents. The Circular and the Ministry of Law's opinion indicated that the term "or" in Section 114A should be read as "and" to carry out the intention of the legislature. However, the Tribunal noted that several decisions, including those by the High Courts and the Supreme Court, have interpreted the term "or" as disjunctive, meaning the penalty should be equal to either the duty or the interest, not both. The Tribunal cited cases such as Styale Corporation, M/s Sony Sales Corporation, and U.K. Enterprises, which supported this interpretation.

In conclusion, the Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's appeal and dismissed it, affirming that the penalty under Section 114A should be equal to the duty confirmed, excluding the interest portion.

(Dictated and pronounced in open court)

---