TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether penalty could be sustained under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 when interest was not quantified; (ii) whether Circular No. 61/2002 issued by CBEC was binding on the adjudicating authorities; (iii) whether the word "or" in Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 was to be read as "and" for the purpose of imposing penalty.
Issue (i): Whether penalty could be sustained under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 when interest was not quantified.
Analysis: The question was considered along with the connected appeal and was answered on the basis of the reasons recorded therein.
Conclusion: The issue was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether Circular No. 61/2002 issued by CBEC was binding on the adjudicating authorities.
Analysis: The issue was decided in the companion judgment relied upon for the present appeal and was not accepted in favour of the Revenue.
Conclusion: The issue was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iii): Whether the word "or" in Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 was to be read as "and" for the purpose of imposing penalty.
Analysis: The interpretative question was resolved in the connected judgment and applied to this appeal.
Conclusion: The issue was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: All the substantial questions of law were resolved against the appellant, and the appeal was held to be without merit.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
