Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (1) TMI 487 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax assessment reopening upheld but income estimation reduced from 15% to 2% gross profit rate The ITAT Mumbai rejected the assessee's challenges to assessment reopening, finding no procedural violations in jurisdiction transfer under s.127, ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tax assessment reopening upheld but income estimation reduced from 15% to 2% gross profit rate

                              The ITAT Mumbai rejected the assessee's challenges to assessment reopening, finding no procedural violations in jurisdiction transfer under s.127, incumbency change notice under s.129, or approval under s.151. The tribunal held that specific information about bogus purchases from untraceable parties provided sufficient grounds for reopening, dismissing claims of borrowed satisfaction. However, regarding estimation of income from alleged bogus purchases, the tribunal reduced the gross profit rate from 15% to 2% on trading of ferrous and non-ferrous metals, considering the 4% VAT rate and comparable tribunal decisions. The appeal was partly allowed.




                              Issues involved:
                              The issues involved in the judgment include challenging the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer, validity of proceedings under section 148, approval granted under section 151, reliance on borrowed satisfaction for issuing notice, failure to provide copies of relied-upon evidence, lack of opportunity for cross-examination, and imposition of interest under section 234A.

                              Challenging Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer:
                              The appeal was filed against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A)-Mumbai for the quantum of assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 for the A.Y. 2009-10. The grounds of appeal challenged various legal aspects, including the jurisdiction of the ld. AO and the proceedings under section 148. The appellant raised concerns about the change of jurisdiction from one Assessing Officer to another and the approval granted under section 151, stating that it was done in a mechanical fashion without independent inquiry.

                              Validity of Proceedings under Section 148:
                              The appellant contested the validity of the proceedings under section 148, arguing that the approval granted under section 151 was mechanical and lacked independent inquiry. The appellant raised objections regarding the notice issued for a change in incumbency and the reliance on the report of DGIT (Investigation), Mumbai without conducting further investigation.

                              Reliance on Borrowed Satisfaction for Issuing Notice:
                              The appellant challenged the reliance on borrowed satisfaction for issuing the notice under section 148. It was argued that the ld. AO placed reliance on the report of DGIT (Investigation), Mumbai without conducting an independent inquiry and without tangible material evidence to justify the need for further investigation.

                              Failure to Provide Copies of Relied-Upon Evidence:
                              The appellant contended that the ld. AO failed to furnish copies of evidence relied upon, depriving the appellant of the opportunity to rebut or controvert the same. The appellant highlighted the importance of providing access to the evidence relied upon to ensure a fair assessment process.

                              Lack of Opportunity for Cross-Examination:
                              The appellant raised concerns about the lack of opportunity for cross-examination of the parties who deposed before the DGIT (Investigation), Mumbai and the Sales Tax Department. However, it was noted that there was no reference to any statements requiring cross-examination, and the appellant did not request cross-examination before the authorities.

                              Imposition of Interest under Section 234A:
                              The appellant contested the imposition of interest under section 234A on the assessed total income, arguing that the original return of income was filed before the due date and the tax liability was discharged by the payment of self-assessment tax under section 140A. The appellant questioned the basis for levying interest under section 234A in this context.

                              Conclusion:
                              The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, addressing the various legal grounds raised by the appellant. The Tribunal considered the arguments regarding jurisdiction, validity of proceedings, reliance on borrowed satisfaction, and lack of opportunity for cross-examination. Ultimately, the Tribunal applied a gross profit rate of 2% on the alleged bogus purchases, differing from the initial assessment. The order was pronounced on 29th December 2023.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found