Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount received by the assessee as a quality claim for poor quality goods was liable to service tax as a declared service under section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The record showed that the supplier issued a credit note describing the payment as a quality claim for deficient goods. The amount was, therefore, treated as compensation received for tolerating supply of poor quality material. On that basis, the receipt was held to fall within the declared service of an act of tolerance.
Conclusion: The amount was held taxable under section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994 and the challenge to the demand failed.