TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Delay Condoned: Appeal Granted, Case Remitted for Further Examination of Claims and Costs.</h1> <h3>KAMAL KANT DEWAN & ANR. Versus WHITE WATER HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.</h3> The SC condoned the delay and granted permission to file the appeal. The respondent company agreed to pay the claimed amount and interest to the ... Submission of claim before COC - HELD THAT:- The pleas and contentions of Kamal Kant Dewan and Bharat Food and Agro Products, as well as the contentions of White Water Hospitality Private Limited, will be examined by the adjudicating authority. The impugned judgment set aside - appeal allowed. Issues involved: Delay condonation, permission to file appeal, payment dispute, claims by appellants, disbanding of Committee of Creditors, examination of claims by adjudicating authority, setting aside impugned judgment, remitting the case for further examination, examination of RP fee/cost.Delay Condonation and Permission to File Appeal: The Supreme Court granted permission to file the appeal after condoning the delay. During the hearing, the respondent company agreed to pay the claimed amount to the Resolution Professional within three weeks. The National Company Law Tribunal will determine the interest due from a specified date till the payment is made.Payment Dispute and Claims by Appellants: The respondent company also agreed to pay interest as calculated by the adjudicating authority to the RP of V.I.R. Foods Limited. Claims have been made by appellants Kamal Kant Dewan and Bharat Food and Agro Products, which were submitted to the Committee of Creditors. However, the Committee has been disbanded, and the claims will be examined by the adjudicating authority.Setting Aside Impugned Judgment and Remitting the Case: The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgments passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and the NCLT. The case was remitted to the adjudicating authority for further examination of the issues and questions, considering the directions provided in the order. The adjudicating authority will also assess the fee/cost of the RP.Conclusion: The appeals were allowed, and any pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
