Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the delay in re-filing the appeals deserved condonation. (ii) Whether, after the Tribunal had decided only the permanent establishment issue and treated the arm's length and profit attribution question as academic, the matter should be remitted to the Tribunal for a decision on that remaining issue.
Issue (i): Whether the delay in re-filing the appeals deserved condonation.
Analysis: The delay in re-filing was condoned in view of the course proposed in the order.
Conclusion: The delay in re-filing the appeals was condoned.
Issue (ii): Whether, after the Tribunal had decided only the permanent establishment issue and treated the arm's length and profit attribution question as academic, the matter should be remitted to the Tribunal for a decision on that remaining issue.
Analysis: The Tribunal had found that the respondent did not have either a fixed place permanent establishment or a dependent agent permanent establishment in India, and had not adjudicated the alternative issue relating to arm's length price and attribution of profits. The matter was therefore sent back so that the Tribunal could return a view on the remaining issue, without disturbing the existing orders.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for decision on the remaining issue.
Final Conclusion: The appeals stood disposed of by condoning the re-filing delays and sending the matter back to the Tribunal for adjudication of the unresolved issue, with liberty to seek statutory appeal after the remand decision.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an appellate forum has adjudicated only one of the substantial issues and an alternative issue remains undecided, the matter may be remitted for decision on the unresolved issue to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.