Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service tax was leviable under the category of Business Auxiliary Service on charges collected for sizing/crushing of coal when the activity formed part of the sale transaction and value added tax had been paid on the composite consideration.
Analysis: The sizing of coal was treated as an incidental and ancillary process connected with making coal marketable and with the manufacture of the final product. The reasoning proceeded on the principle that where an activity amounts to manufacture or forms an integral part of the sale of goods, it cannot be subjected to service tax as a separate service. Reliance was placed on the settled principle of mutually exclusive taxation of the same transaction, and on the fact that the composite sale value already included sizing charges on which VAT had been paid.
Conclusion: Service tax was not leviable on the sizing/crushing charges under Business Auxiliary Service, and the demand, along with the connected interest and penalties, was unsustainable.