Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sizing/crushing of coal undertaken by the assessee for supply under the relevant contracts amounted to "production or processing of goods for or on behalf of the client" falling within Business Auxiliary Service and attracting service tax, or whether it formed part of manufacture and was therefore outside the service tax net.
Analysis: The coal remained the assessee's property until delivery under the contracts, and the sizing charges formed part of the contracted sale price. The activity was undertaken on the assessee's own coal before title passed to the buyers, so it was not carried out for and on behalf of a client. The process of sizing coal was also treated as incidental and ancillary to the completion of the manufactured product, and coal was regarded as excisable goods. The same activity had already been subjected to central excise duty on the assessable value and to VAT/CST on sale, which reinforced the position that the levy could not be shifted to service tax under a different taxing entry. In view of the principle of mutually exclusive levies, an activity treated as manufacture cannot simultaneously be taxed as a service.
Conclusion: Sizing of coal in the facts of the case was not liable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service, and the Revenue's demand could not be sustained.