Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's order directing pre-deposit of 25% of the penalty amount under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 called for interference in writ jurisdiction.
Analysis: The requirement of pre-deposit under Section 129E is mandatory in principle, while dispensing with it is an exception available only when undue hardship is shown. The power to waive or reduce the deposit is discretionary and may be exercised wholly or partly on such terms as are necessary to safeguard revenue. The Tribunal had passed a reasoned order granting partial relief by limiting the deposit to 25% of the penalty amount, and it was open to it to refuse waiver altogether. No ground was made out to disturb that exercise of discretion.
Conclusion: The challenge to the Tribunal's conditional waiver failed and the order requiring deposit of 25% of the penalty amount was upheld.