Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether customs duty, interest and penalty were sustainable on the leftover concrete coated pipes sold after completion of the export obligation, and whether Condition X of Notification No. 21/2015-Cus could be applied to the processed goods manufactured from the imported seamless pipes.
Analysis: Condition X in Notification No. 21/2015-Cus governed the imported materials themselves and not the concrete coated pipes manufactured out of those imported seamless pipes. The dispute concerned leftover processed goods after completion of the export obligation, and Para 4.16 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 specifically permitted disposal of products manufactured out of duty-free inputs once the export obligation was completed. Para 4.28(v) of the Handbook of Procedure, 2004-09 dealt with regularisation of bona fide default and could not be invoked to demand duty in a case where export obligations had already been fulfilled. The notification breach alleged by Revenue was not established.
Conclusion: The demand of customs duty, interest and penalty was not sustainable and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A condition in an import exemption notification applies to the imported goods covered by the exemption, and where the policy expressly permits disposal of products manufactured from duty-free inputs after fulfilment of export obligation, duty cannot be demanded on the processed leftover goods by invoking a provision meant for bona fide default.