TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Differential duty demand invalid without show cause notice, Rs. 19,55,010 refund ordered for violating natural justice</h1> <h3>M/s Panacea Biotec Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Ludhiana</h3> M/s Panacea Biotec Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Ludhiana - TMI Issues Involved:1. Demand of differential duty without issuing a show cause notice.2. Rejection of refund claim of Rs. 19,55,010/- paid under protest.3. Demand of interest on the differential duty.Summary:1. Demand of Differential Duty Without Issuing a Show Cause Notice:The appellant, engaged in the manufacture of P or P Medicines, faced a classification dispute over Euphorbia Prostrata dry extract. The Assistant Commissioner initially confirmed a demand of Rs. 2,71,108/- for short payment of differential duty, which the appellant contested. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent, Derabassi, demanded an additional Rs. 19,55,010/- for the period April 2012 to May 2013 without issuing a show cause notice. The Tribunal found this demand to be in violation of statutory provisions and principles of natural justice, as established by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in cases like Gokak Patel Volkart Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise and CCE Vs. Akay Cosmetics. The Tribunal emphasized that a show cause notice is a condition precedent to any tax demand.2. Rejection of Refund Claim of Rs. 19,55,010/- Paid Under Protest:The appellant paid the demanded amount under protest and later sought a refund, arguing that no show cause notice was issued. The Assistant Commissioner rejected the refund claim, stating that no order established the amount as non-payable. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this rejection. The Tribunal, however, ruled that the rejection was incorrect, citing the Supreme Court's stance that tax collected without authority cannot be retained. The Tribunal directed the Revenue to refund the amount with interest, recognizing that the demand was made without following due legal process.3. Demand of Interest on the Differential Duty:The department also demanded interest on the differential duty amounting to Rs. 4,08,844/-. The Commissioner (Appeals) dropped this demand on the grounds of time bar. The Tribunal upheld this decision, reinforcing the necessity of issuing a show cause notice and following proper legal procedures before making any such demands.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Revenue to refund the amount of Rs. 19,55,010/- along with interest, as the demand was made without issuing a show cause notice and in violation of natural justice principles. The appeal was pronounced in the open court on 06.12.2023.
TaxTMI 