Cinema operator must deposit Rs. 14.6 lakh with interest for not passing GST rate reduction benefits under Section 171

The CCI held that the respondent cinema operator engaged in profiteering by not passing on GST rate reduction benefits on movie tickets priced <=Rs. 100 from 18% to 12% during 01.01.2019 to 31.07.2019. The respondent realized additional Rs. 14,62,604 from customers. The CCI ordered deposit of profiteered amount with 18% interest split equally between Central and State Consumer Welfare Funds within 3 months. While finding contravention of Section 171(1) CGST Act, no penalty was imposed as the penalty provision under Section 171(3A) was not operational during the violation period.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Allegation of profiteering by not passing on the benefit of GST rate reduction.
2. Determination and quantification of profiteering.
3. Respondent's defense and submissions.
4. Commission's findings and directives.

Summary:

1. Allegation of Profiteering:
The Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) received a reference from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering to investigate an application alleging that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of GST rate reduction on movie admission tickets from 18% to 12% effective 01.01.2019. Instead, the Respondent increased the base prices to maintain the same selling prices.

2. Determination and Quantification of Profiteering:
The DGAP's investigation covered the period from 01.01.2019 to 31.07.2019. The Respondent admitted to increasing the base prices of tickets post-GST rate reduction. The DGAP concluded that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of GST rate reduction to the recipients, resulting in profiteering amounting to Rs. 14,62,604/-. This amount was calculated based on the increase in base prices across different ticket categories.

3. Respondent's Defense and Submissions:
The Respondent argued that the cinema business operates on a show-to-show basis with no stock in hand, and ticket prices cannot be changed without permission from Licensing Authorities. The Respondent also claimed that the increase in ticket prices was due to pressure from distributors and was approved by relevant authorities. The DGAP countered that the benefit of tax reduction must be passed on transaction-wise, and the Respondent's arguments about stock and permission were not relevant to the anti-profiteering provisions.

4. Commission's Findings and Directives:
The Commission found that the Respondent had indeed profiteered by increasing base prices and not passing on the GST rate reduction benefit. The total profiteering amount was determined to be Rs. 14,62,604/-. The Respondent was directed to reduce ticket prices and deposit the profiteered amount along with 18% interest into the Central and Telangana State Consumer Welfare Funds. The Commission also noted that the penalty provisions under Section 171 (3A) could not be applied retrospectively. The jurisdictional Commissioners of CGST/SGST Telangana were instructed to monitor compliance with the order.

Conclusion:
The Respondent was found guilty of profiteering by not passing on the GST rate reduction benefit to recipients and was ordered to deposit the profiteered amount with interest into the respective Consumer Welfare Funds.

---