Disciplinary proceedings against chartered accountants cannot continue after the responsible member's death when responsibility was disclosed

Disciplinary proceedings under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the 2007 Rules are personal in nature and are directed against the member responsible for the audit. Where a firm discloses the partner who conducted the audit and that member dies before the complaint is pursued, the proceedings cannot continue against the firm as a substitute for the deceased member. The proviso to Rule 8(2) did not apply because the case was not one where no member had accepted responsibility for the allegations. The closure of the complaint as infructuous was therefore upheld, and reopening of the disciplinary process was refused.

---

---

Issues: Whether disciplinary proceedings under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the 2007 Rules could continue against a firm after the disclosed member who conducted the audit had died, and whether the closure of the complaint as infructuous required interference.

Analysis: The complaint was directed against a firm, but the statutory scheme defines a chartered accountant as a member of the Institute and treats firms separately from members. The disciplinary provisions in the Act contemplate proceedings against members, while the 2007 Rules require the firm to disclose the responsible member and provide for a written statement by the member so disclosed. On the facts, the firm disclosed the name of the partner who had conducted the audit, and that person had already died before the complaint was pursued. The Court held that disciplinary proceedings are personal in nature and cannot continue after the death of the concerned member. The reliance on the proviso to Rule 8(2) did not assist the petitioner because the case was not one where no member had owned responsibility for the allegations.

Conclusion: The closure of the complaint was upheld and no direction for reopening the disciplinary process was issued.

---