Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case alleging fraudulent creation of GST registrations, bogus exports, and wrongful availment of input tax credit and refund under the GST regime.
Analysis: The prayer for bail was considered on the settled principles that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, and that personal liberty under Article 21 must be protected pending trial. The allegations were serious and related to economic offence, but the Court noted that the final prosecution report had been filed, the petitioner had already remained in custody for more than four months, and the maximum punishment was imprisonment up to five years. The evidence was held to be primarily documentary and electronic, with official witnesses, reducing the apprehension of tampering or influencing witnesses. The Court applied the principles governing bail in economic offences and found the case fit for release on stringent conditions.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to strict conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: In a pending trial for an economic offence, bail may be granted where custody has continued for a substantial period, investigation is substantially complete, and the evidence is mainly documentary or electronic with no substantial risk of witness interference or tampering.