Prolonged custody can justify bail in GST prosecutions when the surrounding circumstances support release.

Prolonged custody and the surrounding circumstances may justify bail even in prosecutions under the CGST Act. The High Court considered that the accused had remained in custody for about one year and five months, the allegations concerned creation of firms and filing of GST returns, and the defence relied on the limited monetary benefit attributed to the accused and family circumstances. Balancing the nature of the accusations, the length of incarceration, and the material placed before it, the Court found it appropriate to enlarge the accused on bail. Bail was granted subject to execution of the prescribed bond and sureties.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner, accused of offences under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, was entitled to bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Analysis: The petitioner had remained in custody for about one year and five months. The allegations related to creation of firms and filing of GST returns, while the defence highlighted the limited monetary benefit attributed to the petitioner and his family circumstances. Balancing the nature of accusation, the period of incarceration, and the circumstances placed before it, the Court found it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Conclusion: Bail was granted to the petitioner on execution of the prescribed bond and sureties.

Ratio Decidendi: In a bail matter, prolonged custody and the surrounding circumstances may justify release on bail even where serious allegations under fiscal penal provisions are involved.

---