Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>CGST Authority Fails to Produce Cancellation Order, Court Mandates Order Submission and Potential Registration Restoration</h1> <h3>Ashok Kumar Jha Versus Union of India & Ors.</h3> Ashok Kumar Jha Versus Union of India & Ors. - 2023 (78) G. S. T. L. 315 (Cal.) Issues involved:The issues involved in the judgment are related to the cancellation of the petitioner's registration by the CGST authority without providing a copy of the original order, leading to a situation where the petitioner's registration is shown as suspended in the system.Details of the Judgment:Issue 1: Lack of Original Order for CancellationThe respondent CGST authority failed to produce the original order cancelling the petitioner's registration as per the court's earlier order. The order was not available in the portal, creating a peculiar situation where the petitioner's registration was shown as suspended. The petitioner presented downloaded copies from the portal indicating different statuses of the case, while the respondent submitted that the registration had been cancelled, but the order was missing.Issue 2: Remediless Situation for the PetitionerThe court acknowledged the discrepancies in the system and held that the petitioner should not be left without a remedy due to faults in the department's procedures. The petitioner's right to apply for revocation or file an appeal should not be denied based on the system's errors.JudgmentBased on the facts and submissions, the court directed the respondent CGST authority to provide the hard copy of the original order cancelling the petitioner's registration within fifteen days. Upon receiving the hard copy, the petitioner would be allowed to file an application for revocation. If the department failed to provide the hard copy within the specified time, the respondent CGST authority was instructed to restore the petitioner's registration and retain the liberty to initiate any fresh proceedings.This judgment ensures that the petitioner is not left without a remedy and can exercise their rights in case of cancellation of registration, despite the system discrepancies and missing original order.