Brothers Win Challenge Against Cash Seizure, Court Orders Full Refund with Interest Under CGST Act Section 67 HC allowed petition for release of seized cash under CGST Act. Two brothers challenged seizure of Rs. 1,15,00,000 during search. Court directed ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Brothers Win Challenge Against Cash Seizure, Court Orders Full Refund with Interest Under CGST Act Section 67
HC allowed petition for release of seized cash under CGST Act. Two brothers challenged seizure of Rs. 1,15,00,000 during search. Court directed respondents to remit seized amounts with interest to petitioners' bank accounts within two weeks. Ruling noted that other authorities like Income Tax Department retain right to investigate cash possession further.
Issues involved: Petition for release of seized cash u/s 67 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Summary: The petitioners, two brothers residing in separate floors of a building, filed a petition seeking the release of an aggregate amount of Rs. 1,15,00,000/- seized during a search conducted at their residential premises under Section 67 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The search revealed cash amounts in the bedrooms of each petitioner, with no satisfactory explanation provided for the source of the cash. The petitioners contended that the officers had no power to seize cash under Section 67 of the CGST Act without proper explanation, citing previous decisions of the Court. The petition sought the release of the seized money, which the respondents had kept in a fixed deposit bearing interest. The Court directed respondent no. 2 to remit the respective amounts along with accrued interest to the bank accounts of each petitioner. The petitioners were instructed to provide bank account details to the respondents within one week, with the amounts to be remitted within two weeks thereafter. It was clarified that other authorities, such as the Income Tax Department, were not precluded from taking necessary steps regarding the petitioners' possession of cash, and the respondents were also allowed to take further action under relevant statutes within the bounds of the law.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.