TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Brothers Win Challenge Against Cash Seizure, Court Orders Full Refund with Interest Under CGST Act Section 67</h1> <h3>Gunjan Bindal And Anr. Versus Commissioner of CGST, Delhi West and Ors.</h3> HC allowed petition for release of seized cash under CGST Act. Two brothers challenged seizure of Rs. 1,15,00,000 during search. Court directed ... Seeking release of amount resumed/seized by respondent no. 2 - power to seize cash under Section 67 of the CGST Act - HELD THAT:- The present petition is required to be allowed and the respondents are liable to refund the money seized - The respondents state that the amounts so seized has been kept in a fixed deposit bearing interest. Respondent no. 2 is, accordingly, directed to remit the amount of ₹14,50,000/- along with accrued interest to the bank account of petitioner no. 1, and remit ₹1,00,50,000/- along with accrued interest to the bank account of petitioner no. 2 - Petition allowed. Issues involved: Petition for release of seized cash u/s 67 of the CGST Act, 2017.Summary:The petitioners, two brothers residing in separate floors of a building, filed a petition seeking the release of an aggregate amount of Rs. 1,15,00,000/- seized during a search conducted at their residential premises under Section 67 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The search revealed cash amounts in the bedrooms of each petitioner, with no satisfactory explanation provided for the source of the cash. The petitioners contended that the officers had no power to seize cash under Section 67 of the CGST Act without proper explanation, citing previous decisions of the Court. The petition sought the release of the seized money, which the respondents had kept in a fixed deposit bearing interest. The Court directed respondent no. 2 to remit the respective amounts along with accrued interest to the bank accounts of each petitioner. The petitioners were instructed to provide bank account details to the respondents within one week, with the amounts to be remitted within two weeks thereafter. It was clarified that other authorities, such as the Income Tax Department, were not precluded from taking necessary steps regarding the petitioners' possession of cash, and the respondents were also allowed to take further action under relevant statutes within the bounds of the law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
